(3)
126
an expression of our opinion to the Secretary of State for the Colonies.
Allof us, residents in HongKong, having of recent years had per- sonal experience of what Naval Warfare means to neutral trade must, I
feel sure,
be united in protesting against the terms of this Declara-
tion.
The food question is, of course, of the greatest moment to the
British Isles, and under the circumstances it seems difficult to un-
derstand how H.M. Goverment could come to the agreement they have.
So long ago as our waris with Napoleon I, this question arose
and it may therefore be worth while here stating that in 1795 Greut
Britain, being at war with France, declared food stuffs carried on
the high seas in neutral shipping destined for a French port to be
contraband and therefore liable to capture.
On protests however being made by the United States of America,
Denmark and Sweden, this was modified to cargoes destined for French
Naval or Military stations,
It seems strange that this humane policy should now have been
abandoned by the Great Powera.
I have dealt with so fully with this question, gentlemen, as I
feel we should speak in no uncertain voice on so important a matter.
We all, or nearly all, have had personal experience of what took
place during the recent wars of Japon, first with China, and later with
Russia, while some of us can remember the difficulties which arose in
regard to neutral trade during the war between France and China.
We can consequently speak of our direct experience, and can rea-
lize perhaps even more fully than people further from the actual scene
of war what these hindrances to trade mean.
The Committee trust therefore, gentlemen, that in this matter
they have your fullest and heartiest support for the steps taken in
protesting against the present proposed International Agreement.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.